Real-World Adherence to the Step-Up Strategy in Pancreatic Necrosis Management: A Tertiary Center Experience
Main Article Content
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is a clinically heterogeneous condition that can become life-threatening, particularly in the presence of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). Over the past two decades, the step-up approach has emerged as a preferred management strategy, evolving with advances in technique and clinical experience. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the real-world adherence to the step-up approach in a tertiary care hospital and to assess associated short- and long-term outcomes. A total of 146 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed and divided into two groups: the adherence group (n=134), managed according to the step-up protocol, and the non-adherence group (n=12), who underwent upfront surgical intervention. Outcomes including mortality, complication rates, incidence of multiorgan failure, and predictors of poor prognosis were compared. The adherence rate to the step-up approach was 91.8%. Mortality rates were similar between the two groups (16.42% in the adherence group vs. 16.67% in the non-adherence group, p>0.05). However, new-onset multiorgan failure occurred significantly less frequently in the adherence group (9.7%) compared to the non-adherence group (25%, p<0.05). The overall complication rate was notably lower in the adherence group (12.66%) versus the non-adherence group (50%). These findings suggest that the step-up approach is feasible and effective in managing IPN, with high adherence rates and favorable outcomes. Future studies should aim to refine patient selection and explore adjunctive therapies that may further improve prognosis in this high-risk population.
Keywords:
Infected pancreatic necrosis, Stepup approach, Acute pancreatitis, Minimally invasive surgery, Mortality, Complication rate, Multiorgan failureCurr Clin Med Educ 03 (01), 124−132 (2025)
Received 11 Jan 2025 | Revised 22 Feb 2025 | Accepted 19 Mar 2025 | Online Available 30 Mar 2025
Data Availability Statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conficts of interest.
Funding: No funding was received for this manuscript.
License : Current Clinical and Medical Educationhas chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to thematerial. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.